The Supremacy Clause

ObamaCare proponents will make their anti-Tenth Amendment argument in part at least on the Supremacy Clause, which is supposed to mean that on legal matters involving the enumerated powers listed in the Constitution federal law would trump state law. What it most certainly does not mean is what the left will argue: on ALL matters the Supremacy Clause reigns supreme.

This is a dangerous interpretation of our Constitution and it must be exposed immediately for the fraud that it is.

Our Constitution is a Constitution meant to be interpreted according to the Framers' intent. How do we know? Because it was a Constitution based upon a fixed philosophy: the laws of nature and of nature's God. It is indeed a self-evident truth that the only legitimate form of government is one that secures the unalienable rights of all of the American people, including their posterity.

Any other form of government, no matter where we find it, is illegitimate. Period.

That is the miracle achieved in Philadelphia in 1776. It was a singular moment in a movement inspired by God (our Creator), the one who reigns Supreme over all. Look it up.

The Founders didn't put together a government meant to exercise absolute supremacy over the American people, so it is inconceivable that they meant that the Supremacy clause made any proclamation by the federal government the "supreme" authority over the American people.

I think not.

The American people are accountable to God, the Constitution, ourselves and each other. The Supremacy Clause cannot change that which is unalienable. To do so would be a fundamental transformation of the United States of America.

Hmmmm. I seem to recall hearing that somewhere before.